Most of us are raised on a romantic story about marriage. The legal system tells a very different story. Understanding that reality doesn't make love colder. It makes commitment clearer.
Disclaimer: This article is for general informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal, psychological, or professional advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and individual circumstances matter. Consult a qualified professional for advice specific to your situation.
We are raised on the idea that marriage is about love, permanence, and emotional union.
In law, marriage is none of those things.
In law, marriage is a contract. It creates enforceable rights, obligations, and default rules governing money, property, debt, caregiving, inheritance, healthcare decisions, taxation, and post-separation responsibility.
Courts apply these rules with the same seriousness they apply to business contracts — often without regard to whether the outcome feels emotionally fair.
Understanding that does not make love colder.
It makes commitment clearer.
The legal system is built around predictability, not poetry. This is not cynicism. It is structure. And structure is what makes freedom possible.
Before signing the contract, ask yourself these questions honestly
Is it because you genuinely want the legal structure, or because "that's what you do" after being together for a certain time? Be brutally honest.
What problem does the legal contract solve that couldn't be solved by simply remaining committed partners? What specific legal benefits do you actually need?
Is this decision driven by your actual needs as a couple, or by family pressure, social expectations, or the desire to perform commitment publicly?
Are you excited about the legal commitment and responsibilities, or are you excited about the celebration, the dress, and the party? These are not the same thing.
"Marriage and love have very little to do with each other. If people were madly in love they could either marry or not get married and it's not going to change anything except the legal status of things."
Have the wedding if you want to celebrate your love with community.
Skip the legal marriage if it doesn't serve your actual relationship.
The two are separate things — don't conflate them.
Prenuptial agreements are widely misunderstood as hostile, unromantic, or distrustful. In reality, they are one of the most effective tools humans have for preventing future conflict.
~95% of properly executed prenups are upheld
Full or partial enforcement. Courts focus on procedure, not whether the outcome feels nice.
Note: Some prenups may be partially upheld (certain clauses struck down while others remain valid).
Only 5-12% are ever challenged
And many of those settle before trial. Most prenups work exactly as intended.
When prenups fail, it is usually because:
They ask: "Was this procedurally fair?"
Was it rushed?
Was anything hidden?
Did both parties have counsel?
Exploitation of knowledge or wealth disparity?
Educational or wealth disparity alone rarely invalidates a prenup — but exploitation of that disparity can.
A prenup is not about pessimism.
It is about consent with eyes open.
Marriage is not good or bad. It is a legal instrument with tradeoffs.
Strong relationships are not built on romance. They are built on:
Knowing what you need
Many conflicts arise not because people are malicious, but because they don't know what they actually need.
Being able to say it
Knowing what you want is useless if you cannot say it. Suppressed needs emerge as resentment.
Seeing your partner clearly
Love thrives when people see each other clearly, not when they maintain comforting illusions.
Separateness prevents stagnation
Attraction requires separateness. Fusion breeds stagnation.
Attention grows when nothing is guaranteed
Recognizing nothing is guaranteed makes attention and care feel urgent rather than automatic.
Psychological safety plus honesty predicts durability
far better than intensity or destiny.
Commitment feels safest when exit is possible.
When people stay because they choose to — not because they are trapped — loyalty becomes voluntary rather than compulsory.
That shift alone transforms power dynamics. It replaces fear-based loyalty with chosen loyalty.
Clear agreements are not anti-romantic.
They are anti-hostage.
People who make their children their entire identity are more likely to divorce, not less.
They stop investing in themselves
They stop investing in their partner
They forget that children leave — partners are meant to stay
Your partnership is the emotional blueprint your children will replicate.
Being a good partner to your co-parent is being a good parent.
of marriages end in divorce
Median length of first marriages ending in divorce
Second marriages fail at higher rates
Financial conflict and infidelity
Divorce is expensive, slow, and adversarial. The court system introduces incentives misaligned with healing.
It can happen to you.
That is not pessimism. That is statistical literacy.
To never separate
To perform a social ideal
To cling to fantasy
The real goal is:
To build something honest, fair, kind, conscious, and chosen.
If it lasts a lifetime, that is beautiful.
If it lasts a chapter and leaves both people wiser and more capable of love, that is not failure.
That is success, properly defined.
Be emotionally and financially capable of leaving — even if you never do.
Know why you are marrying — and what divorce actually means.
Do not outsource your emotional stability to your spouse.
Be present in your children's lives — but not absent from your partnership.
Understand that once courts enter, the system's incentives are not aligned with your peace.
Marriage is not a promise that nothing will change.
It is a structure for navigating change.
The clearer you see it, the more freely you can choose it.
And choice is what makes love meaningful in the first place.
Take the evidence-based assessment to understand your relationship dynamics
Take Assessment